![los angeles countyer ercom los angeles countyer ercom](https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1179971535559254016/BwRrN68i_400x400.jpg)
![los angeles countyer ercom los angeles countyer ercom](https://staticr1.blastingcdn.com/media/photogallery/2017/12/26/660x290/b_1200x630/a-los-angeles-si-e-temuta-linvasione-aliena_1750735.jpg)
- #Los angeles countyer ercom code#
- #Los angeles countyer ercom trial#
- #Los angeles countyer ercom professional#
- #Los angeles countyer ercom series#
The arbitration provision in the MOU for BU 621 provides in relevant part: Only those grievances which directly concern or involve the interpretation or application of the specific terms and provisions of this Memorandum of Understanding and which are brought by an employee who was represented by PPOA in any steps of the grievance procedure may be submitted to arbitration hereunder.” Within ten (10) business days from the receipt of the written decision of the department head or his/her designated representative, an employee, only if he/she is represented by PPOA, may request that the grievance be submitted to arbitration as provided for hereinafter. The arbitration provision in the MOU for BU 612 provides, in relevant part: Only those grievances which directly concern or involve the interpretation or application of the specific terms and provisions of this Memorandum of Understanding and which are brought by an employee who was represented by ALADS in any steps of the grievance procedure may be submitted to arbitration hereunder.” Within ten (10) business days from the receipt of the written decision of the department head or his designated representative, an employee, only if he/she is represented by ALADS, may request that the grievance be submitted to arbitration as provided for hereinafter. The arbitration provision in the MOU for BU 611 provides, in relevant part: The arbitration provisions in the MOU's for BU' s 611, 612, and 621 Unions filed requests with ERCOM for class arbitration of the grievances, which requests ERCOM granted, consolidating the arbitration for the five bargaining units.
#Los angeles countyer ercom series#
The grievance procedures consisted of a series of progressive steps culminating in arbitration. The MOU's contained grievance procedures for resolving complaints concerning the interpretation or application of the MOU's. The Unions, on behalf of their bargaining units, entered into five collective bargaining agreements or memoranda of understanding (MOU's) with the County concerning the employment of bargaining unit employees.
![los angeles countyer ercom los angeles countyer ercom](https://ppoa.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/PPOA_70thLogo-whitetext.png)
The Unions represent employees in five bargaining units (sometimes BU's)–ALADS represents BU 611 (LASD nonsupervisor or “line-level” deputy sheriffs) and LAPPOA represents BU 612 (LASD supervisor-level deputy sheriffs holding the rank of sergeant or lieutenant), BU 621 (LASD nonsworn employees including security officers), BU 631 (former OPS nonsupervisor or line-level peace officers), and BU 632 (former OPS supervisor level peace officers holding the rank of sergeant or lieutenant).
#Los angeles countyer ercom trial#
Because we hold that all of the issues between the parties were subject to individual arbitrations and therefore the part of section 1281.2 upon which the trial court relied was inapplicable, we reverse.
#Los angeles countyer ercom code#
The trial court refused to compel such arbitrations, ruling that Code of Civil Procedure section 1281.2 ( section 1281.2 ) gave it discretion, in the interest of judicial economy, to stay the arbitration of arbitral issues between the parties while it resolved issues between the parties that were not subject to arbitration, which resolution might make arbitrations unnecessary.
#Los angeles countyer ercom professional#
Goyette, Gold River, for Cross-complainants and Respondents.Ĭross-defendant and appellant the County of Los Angeles, by and through its sheriff's department and Lee Baca (County), sought to compel individual arbitrations of grievances by certain union employees employed by the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department (LASD) and the now defunct Office of Public Safety (OPS) and represented by cross-complainants and respondents the Los Angeles County Professional Peace Officers Association (LAPPOA) and the Association for Los Angeles Deputy Sheriffs (ALADS) (collectively Unions). Knothe, Los Angeles, for Cross-defendant and Appellant.